Friday, September 8, 2017

Perspective-Taking through class "Pinwheel" activity


In previous work in Emily Mikuzis’ senior English 101 class, her students worked on exemplification—making a claim and supporting it with examples rather than reasoned evidence.  In this case, students are using the guiding question “To what extent has your education served you?” with examples from their own experience.

To prepare for this lesson students read and annotated an excerpt from Ta-Nehisi Coates’ “Between the World and Me,” which focuses on his experience in education—specifically compliance versus critical thinking.  Students prepared by annotating form 4 different perspectives, color-coding each: urban student, suburban student, urban teacher, suburban teacher. 

They used Coates’ description of his neighborhood for the experience with urban schools and their own experiences with suburban schools.  Understanding that this pulls on some biases, the class had a conversation on empathy, per  While this is a limitation of the activity, the class talked through the nuances of each, handling it compassionately.  For example, one student pointed out that just because someone has a certain identity, it doesn’t mean they only have one perspective or a common perspective. 

Students worked independently first, then in small like-groups, then together in a “pinwheel” activity [from Sarah Wessling on the Teachers’Channel].   One member of each “perspective” sat in the “hot seat” and answered questions posed by the “provocateur,” who had prepared based on a question writing workshop held by the whole class on the previous day.  Therefore, groups were aware of some of the questions, but they could not prepare for all.  In the “pinwheel,” the provocateur also asked follow-up questions to continue and push the conversation.  Students referenced the text directly but also made inferences based on their perspective.  This is a much smaller group discussion than a Socratic with only 6 students in the group to encourage all students to participate while the outer group participated in a real-time backchannel on BackChannelChat.com

After class students debriefed.  Students expressed the difficulty in looking through others’ perspective, but they also appreciated that it slowed them down, forcing themselves to rethink what they would say.  They also really liked the backchannel because they could speak from their own life perspective and experiences, which allowed them a comfortable place to share.  In the end they felt it helped them take different perspectives in addition to simply analyzing what the text means.  After this practice activity, students will return to this activity in a few weeks, focusing on multiple authors and putting them “in conversation with each other.”

Thursday, September 7, 2017

One Year in AP: the first assessment (Week Three)

By Mark Heintz

Context

I have two main focuses as I write this weekly blog. Two driving questions that I have in my mind while making decisions.  They are:
  • How do I know if my students know? 
  • How do I get them to know if they know?  
Whether that is a skill or content, I want to know if they know it.   I no longer think it is acceptable for me to guess or get a feeling on whether or not they know it. Getting the students to know if they know it is down right hard, but I am really attempting to get to a point where the students can recognize their understandings or progress on their skill levels and content knowledge.  Therefore, the purpose of this year of reflection is see how I make progress towards these two goals and elicit feedback from staff, students, and hopefully people who follow along in the journey.

Week Three 

This week marked the end of the first unit and the beginning of the next.  The first unit is only two weeks and will provide me with important feedback on which students will need extra support. Also, the unit will help me understand how much instruction I will need to dedicate to working with documents and writing.  Every year my take away from the first unit is to do more documents and more writing. This year was no different.  You can read how last week went here.

Answer the Question

This week's plan entailed an assessment of the first unit with a reflection piece, and then shifting into the second unit. The purpose the second unit is:



The goal of this week was to have the students reflect on the first unit, to be able to write a thesis statement for the long essay, and master some of the religions content.


Cite Specific Evidence
Several moments I captured on video of the student reflecting on the first unit were very revealing. The clips reveal examples of students who were able to identify specifically what  they knew from the first unit and what they need to work on skill-wise. Listen to the conversations between the students as they look through their work.

  • Self assessment and peer assessment on the content portion of the test


  • Self assessment in writing


The students excelled at the reflection.  I needed more time than I allotted to get through all of the questions.

Explanation of the Evidence 

The students need more help with writing.  I knew that, but it was great to see that they knew that! It might sound terrible that they weren't successful in the skill, but it was more important to me that they were still successful in my goal of being able to identify what they know and don't know. I, too, learned where they are with their progress and now I can make appropriate adjustments to my instruction and to tailor support for individual students. Reflecting on their current understanding is the key to progress; and at this point in the year, that is far more important than their current grade.

I feel that the students are making progress towards mastery. I wanted to ensure they knew that their grade is in progress and it will change in the positive direction throughout time as we march through the class and grow our abilities.  

Reflection and Impact

Wow! This has really changed my instruction.  I have limited the amount of documents we go through at a time so I can ensure the students master it.  Furthermore, we started working on thesis statements.  I originally was going to only spend one day on the thesis this week and come back to it next week. However, I spent the remainder of the week on thesis statements and am still going strong into the next week.  I need to keep things simple, small, and ensure mastery.  Hope to have you read next week! 

Read week four here.

Wednesday, September 6, 2017

Create and Reflect with Apple Clips!

By Linda Ashida

For our 3rd in the series of Team on Tuesday Professional Learning experiences we were excited to connect via Google Hangout with Joe Robinson, the Instructional Technology Director from Barrington School District 220. Teachers from EG joined us in person in the Collab Lab and we also connected virtually with colleagues from Rolling Meadows High School and Prospect High Schools to learn from Joe's examples. He demonstrated just how easy it is to build a video clip with photos and video, and edit the clips with filters, emojis, animated graphics. We were especially excited about the speech to text feature! As we watched Joe's step-by-step demo, we had time to experiment on our own, ask questions, and  explore possibilities for how we could use Apple Clips in in our own professional learning and in our classrooms.

Since we were learning about Apple Clips, I thought a good way to share what we learned would be to make my very first  Clip!




If you are familiar with Adobe Spark, you will find that this tool is as easy to use with even more functionality.  There are so many possibilities to use this as a tool to create, share, and reflect on learning.

Want to learn more? Want to brainstorm possibilities?  Do you have examples of your own to share? We'd love to connect with you!

For more examples, check out #AppleClips on Twitter.

A huge shout out to Joe for taking the time to connect with us! Team on Tuesday this week reminded us of the power of collaboration and how technology can support those learning connections across disciplines and beyond our school walls!

Tuesday, September 5, 2017

Student Involvement in Assessment (Part 1)

By: Rachel Barry

When I was a student, I was the true definition of a rote learner.  I also was very involved in extra-curricular activities, so I would do what I needed to in order to obtain the grade I wanted.  Now as a teacher, I regret that the school system allowed me to spend so much time focusing on grades, instead of truly learning.  

Attitude Towards Grades

I feel that a significant part of this was the assessment process.  If I got a poor score on a test, I didn't always go back to learn what I missed.  If it was going to be included on another assessment (ie: final exam), I would learn enough to get by, but never go back to fully understand the content and how it related to the course or real life. As a teacher I am now trying to change how I assess (both formatively and summatively) to create learning experiences from these assessments.  I had been finding that students who receive an "A" feel that they have learned all that they need to learn, and student who receive an "F" feel that they cannot learn.  Therefore, I am working to promote continuous growth through assessments, instead of an assessment being the "final call" of what a student knows.

Getting Students Involved in the Process

Last year, I started incorporating students in the assessment process.  For the first quiz of the year, I have students grade their own assessment.  I do this by passing back each student's quiz with a colored pen.  I show the answer key over Apple TV and talk through how I grade each problem.  Finally, I show how I use the grading rubric to assign a grade to the quiz.


Once they have assigned their grade, I have them go through the questions that they got wrong and make corrections.  



As you can see, students are using this assessment as a learning tool, fostering more growth and understanding.  These quiz grades go in the gradebook in the formative category, so there isn't a battle over getting "points" back.  The conversations with students were focused on the content and application of skills instead of spending time discussing grades.  It was awesome!

Personal Reflection

As I continue to grow in my professional development, I am becoming less scared of trying new things.  Throughout the year, I hope to keep the assessment conversation going, as well as continuously obtain student input as to assessment methods that continue to motivate them in the learning process.  I will continue to think back on the thought of "What would have made me want to learn in class?" instead of my high school mentality of "What do I need to do in order to get the grade that I want?"  I will be following up with more posts on student involvement in the assessment process, so stay tuned!

Thursday, August 31, 2017

One Year in AP: Contextualization

By Mark Heintz

Context

A step back if you will.  This year, I have two main focuses. Two driving questions that I have in my mind while making decisions.  They are:
  • How do I know if my students know? 
  • How do I get them to know if they know?  
Whether that is a skill or content, I want to know if they know it.   I no longer think it is acceptable for me to guess or get a feeling on whether or not they know it. Getting the students to know if they know it is down right hard, but I am really attempting to get to a point where the students can recognize their understandings or progress on their skill levels and content knowledge.  Therefore, the purpose of this year of reflection is see how I make progress towards these two goals and elicit feedback from staff, students, and hopefully people who follow along in the journey.

Answer the Question

My focus this week was for students to be able to write two different types of short answer responses and learn the essential content of the Neolithic Period and the River Valleys Era.  Not only do I want the students to able to do the skills (in this case, write well) and know the content, I want them to be able to know if they know it.



 I approached the writing using the ACE acronym that I stole from Freeman-Pedia.  I love the simplicity of it. ACE keeps them focused on the task at hand and make connections to how they would be assessed.




Cite Specific Evidence

How do I know that the students know the content and can do the skills?  Well, the clip below is one document on the progress towards my goal. To address my week's focus I prompted the students to write about how their previous academic journey's would help them or hurt them this year.  To do this, they wrote in the way they would be assessed at the end of the week with a new and content-specific short answer response.

Their first responses revealed a lot about their writing, but also their previous journey.  To help the students know how they progressing on the skill, I asked them provide feedback to their peers on their work.  Linda Ashida captured some of this process and you can watch that video below.

I noted a few timestamps to help with the viewing and citation of evidence.


0:00
I used Teamshake to get students into pairs
1:07
I explain ACE
1:38
I explain how citing evidence needs to be providing specific evidence.  
2:10
I explain how to explain.
2:45
Students give feedback to other students. They are underlining and annotating.
3:45
I provide whole class instruction and the cognitive research
4:36
Students evaluating each other's work
5:25
Explanation of new context-moving to content specific -Egypt and Mesopotamia
8:10
Students reading through information on River Valley Civilizations
10:00
Redirect whole class to provide feedback and help with recall


Here are two samples from the content-specific short answer response at the end of the week.



Explanation of the Evidence

I two content quizzes that were fill in the blank. It covered all the objectives and were fill in the blanks.  The kids did really well on these and they proved that they knew the content.  Whew! I think I got that one. 



The writing is a lot harder.  In the two samples above, the first student did what the task asked.  The student addressed the question in the first sentence by stating a change from Paleolithic and Neolithic societies.  The student brought in the specific evidence of warriors, artisans, and elites to validate that point. Finally, the student stated agricultural surpluses and population changes led caused this change.  
The second student failed to give an explanation as to why the change occurred.  This is where most of the student ended up.  To be honest, I am completely happy with their progress!  They knew the facts and they were able to correctly identify the skills.  Keep in mind, that the national average for a short answer out of 3 points is right around 1.  It is incredibly hard and to have the students get through two of the parts is incredible progress.  

Reflection and Impact

Changes for next year, I will only give the students one of the short answer. I will model one more with them before they take the assessment.  



Wednesday, August 30, 2017

Authentically Engaging Students in 1st 5 Days

By Kim Miklusak

In AP Language we decided to do an assignment right off the bat that would not only help us get to know our students and what is important to them, but also help them dive right in to rhetoric and authentic writing.  This year students will be participating in the NY Times Student Editorial Writing Contest.  For this project, students will write an editorial on a topic of their choosing, 450 words, with at least 2 pieces of research.

We reviewed the assignment with students, they read the NYT winners from last year, and compiled a list of skills they noticed made the editorials successful.  We then brainstormed topics we were interested in with the people at our table.  To start narrowing down our topic, we got students up on their feet, doing a "speed dating" activity that I have seen our foreign language teachers do, specifically Linda Ashida.

One side of the room talked about the topic they were interested in; the other side of the room asked questions to help narrow their focus and ultimately reach a call to action.  After every 30 seconds, students would switch and continue to speak about their topic.  They ended the activity by returning to their seats and debriefing with their table.

From their students wrote their first draft of their editorial.  Over the next few days they shared with their peers, receiving preliminary feedback on audience and purpose.  This week students will revise their appeal to strengthen their appeal to ethos, next week pathos, the final week logos--ultimately they will write one final draft in which they find the appropriate balance for their specific call to action.  Our goal is for students to write several drafts over the coming months, incorporating what they are learning in AP Lang, but also using what they are leaning from the writing process and applying it to their classroom reading and writing as well.

Please follow us at the hashtag #1YrInEng to see how we are doing!

Tuesday, August 29, 2017

Build Community & Problem Solve at the Same Time

By Linda Ashida

  • Are you searching for answers to a question?
  • Do you need fresh ideas to respond to a challenge?
  • Are you looking for new ways to build community and foster teamwork in your classroom?
  • Are you exploring new strategies for a lesson? 
  • Do you imagine lessons where students do more of the talking and learn from one another?

Did you answer yes to one of the questions above?

Then the Reciprocity Ring Exercise could be for you!



Background

Joe Bush led us in this team-building and problem-solving activity for our second Team on Tuesdays. You can learn more about this weekly learning exchange series from our previous post: Connect with Students from the Start.

First Joe explained the concept for the activity and how it has been used in business for brainstorming and problem-solving. He then shared how he has used the exercise in his Leadership Through Service class.  The students posed questions and leveraged the ideas of their peers to share answers, solutions and resources. After doing the activity with his students, he realized how valuable it could be for teachers to use in their classes.



The Process 

Simple Steps in a short period of time (15-30 minutes)

1) Write one or two questions on the wall.
2) Rotate to read the questions of your peers.
3) Share ideas or resources.
4) Continue rotating to learn from the ideas and responses of peers, and add any new ideas.
5) Debrief as a group (on both the process and the content shared)
  • What are the takeaways? 
  • What will be your next steps?

The Result

With simple steps in a short period of time:
  • We left with new ideas, solutions and resources to our own questions.
  • We were inspired by the questions and responses of our peers.
  • We brainstormed ideas for using this same activity in our own classrooms to foster a learner-centered environment; to get our students collaborating with their peers for answers to questions or solutions to problems.
  • We established new connections with our colleagues.
  • We made plans for follow-up conversations and connections in each others' classrooms.

Gallery

See the video and photos below to get a better idea of what the activity looked like.